IBC法律金融會計事務所

最高法院裁定，利用泰國領土作為「實質行為發生地」以聯繫和遊說客戶，已充分構成「在泰國境內經營證券業務」，無論資金或資產位於何處。儘管被告在一般的《外商營商法》獲得豁免，惟仍依特別法即《證券交易委員會法》被認定有罪。The Supreme Court ruled that utilizing Thai territory as an operational base—the "Place of Substantial Act"—for contacting and persuading clients fully constitutes "operating a securities business in Thailand," regardless of where the money or assets are located. While the defendants were exempt under the general Foreign Business Act, they were found guilty under the spe

儘管沒有資金進入泰國經濟體系且證券位於海外，最高法院裁定，利用泰國作為聯繫和說服客戶的營運基地，即構成在泰國境內經營證券業務。被告因未依法註冊為有限公司且缺乏強制性許可證，被判違反《證券交易委員會法》而有罪。